Benchmark – Community Teaching Plan: Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal

The benchmark assesses the following competency:
4.2 Communicate therapeutically with patients.
The RN to BSN program at Grand Canyon University meets the requirements for clinical competencies as defined by the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) and the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN), using nontraditional experiences for practicing nurses. These experiences come in the form of direct and indirect care experiences in which licensed nursing students engage in learning within the context of their hospital organization, specific care discipline, and local communities.
Note: The teaching plan proposal developed in this assignment will be used to develop your Community Teaching Plan: Community Presentation due in Topic 5. You are strongly encouraged to begin working on your presentation once you have received and submitted this proposal.
Select one of the following as the focus for the teaching plan:
Primary Prevention/Health Promotion
Secondary Prevention/Screenings for a Vulnerable Population
Bioterrorism/Disaster
Environmental Issues
Use the “Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal” resource to complete this assignment. This will help you organize your plan and create an outline for the written assignment.
After completing the teaching proposal, review the teaching plan proposal with a community health and public health provider in your local community.
Request feedback (strengths and opportunities for improvement) from the provider.
Complete the “Community Teaching Experience” form with the provider. You will submit this form in Topic 5.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
BSNnursing
ATTACHED FILE(S)

Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal
Planning and Topic
Directions: Develop an educational series proposal for your community using one of the following four topics:
Bioterrorism/Disaster
Environmental Issues
Primary Prevention/Health Promotion
Secondary Prevention/Screenings for a Vulnerable Population
Planning Before Teaching:

Name and Credentials of Teacher:

Estimated Time Teaching Will Last:

Location of Teaching:

Supplies, Material, Equipment Needed:

Estimated Cost:

Community and Target Aggregate:

Topic:
Identification of Focus for Community Teaching (Topic Selection):
Epidemiological Rationale for Topic (Statistics Related to Topic):
Teaching Plan Criteria
Your teaching plan will be graded based on its effectiveness and relevance to the population selected. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Nursing Diagnosis:
Readiness for Learning: Identify the factors that would indicate the readiness to learn for the target aggregate. Include emotional and experiential readiness to learn.
Learning Theory to Be Utilized: Explain how the theory will be applied.

Goal: Healthy People 2020 (HP2020) objective(s) utilized as the goal for the teaching. Include the appropriate objective number and rationale for using the selected HP2020 objective (use at least one objective from one of the 24 focus areas). If an HP2020 objective does not support your teaching, explain how your teaching applies to one of the two overarching HP2020 goals.
How Does This HP2020 Objective Relate to Alma Ata’s Health for All Global Initiatives
Develop Behavioral Objectives (Including Domains), Content, and Strategies/Methods:

Behavioral Objective
and Domain
Example – Third-grade students will name one healthy food choice in each of the five food groups by the end of the presentation. (Cognitive Domain)

Content
(be specific)
Example – The Food Pyramid has five food groups which are….
Healthy foods from each group are….
Unhealthy foods containing a lot of sugar or fat are….

Strategies/Methods
(label and describe)
Example – Interactive poster presentation of the FoodPyramid. After an explanation of the poster and each food category, allow students to place pictures of foods on the correct spot on the pyramid. Also, have the class analyze what a child had for lunch by putting names of foods on the poster and discussing what food group still needs to be eaten throughout day.

1.

1.

1.

2.

2.

2.

3.

3.

3.

4.

4.

4.
Creativity: How was creativity applied in the teaching methods/strategies?
Planned Evaluation of Objectives (Outcome Evaluation): Describe what you will measure for each objective and how.

Planned Evaluation of Goal:Describe how and when you could evaluate the overall effectiveness of your teaching plan.
Planned Evaluation of Lesson and Teacher (Process Evaluation):
Barriers: What are potential barriers that may arise during teaching and how will those be handled?
Therapeutic Communication
4.2 Communicate therapeutically with patients.
How will you begin your presentation and capture the interest of your audience? Describe the type of activity will you use with your audience to exhibit active listening? Describe how you applied active listening in tailoring your presentation to your audience? How will you conclude your presentation? What nonverbal communication techniques will you employ?
© 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Course Code Class Code
NRS-428VN NRS-428VN-IO1272
Criteria Percentage
Content 80.0%
Planning and Topic 30.0%
EffecEveness of Teaching Plan Criteria 40.0%
TherapeuEc CommunicaEon(C 4.2 Communicate
therapeuEcally with paEents.) 10.0%
OrganizaEon and EffecEveness 15.0%
OrganizaEon of Proposal, Paragraph Development,
and TransiEons 10.0%
Criteria 2Mechanics of WriEng(includes spelling,
punctuaEon, grammar, language use) 5.0%
Format 5.0%
Paper Format(use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment) 2.0%
1
DocumentaEon of Sources (citaEons, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style) 3.0%
Total Weightage 100%
2
Assignment Title
Benchmark – Community Teaching Plan: Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal
UnsaEsfactory (0.00%)
The chosen topic is not one of four approved topics. The
epidemiologic raEonale is omi\ed.
Two or more of the assignment criteria are omi\ed.
TherapeuEc communicaEon approach is omi\ed. TherapeuEc
approach is not demonstrated.
OrganizaEon of proposal is disjointed. Paragraphs and transiEons
consistently lack unity and coherence. There are no apparent
connecEons between ideas. TransiEons are inappropriate or
lacking.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communicaEon of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construcEon is used.
Template is not used appropriately or documentaEon format is
rarely followed correctly.
3
Sources are not documented.
4
Total Points
100.0
Less Than SaEsfactory (80.00%)
The teaching plan is based on an approved topic. The
epidemiological raEonal contains significant inaccuracies.
More than one of the assignment criteria are omi\ed. Overall,
the teaching plan is vague. Significant informaEon is needed.
The teaching plan a\empts to communicate with an acEvity; the
acEvity is not appropriate for the teaching plan. It is unclear if
acEve listening techniques were used to connect with the
audience. A parEal summary of how the interacEon of the
audienceis presented.It is unclear if nonverbal techniques were
employed. More informaEon is needed.
Some degree of organizaEon is evident. Some paragraphs and
transiEons may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence,
or cohesiveness.
Some degree of organizaEon is evident. Some paragraphs and
transiEons may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence,
or cohesiveness.Frequent and repeEEve mechanical errors
distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register),
sentence structure, or word choice are present.
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken;
lack of control with formaang is apparent.
5
DocumentaEon of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formaang
errors.
6
SaEsfactory (88.00%)
The teaching plan is based on an approved topic. The
epidemiological raEonal is unclear. There are some inaccuracies.
One of the assignment criteria is omi\ed or, mulEple criteria are
incomplete. The teaching plan can be effecEve, but more
informaEon or raEonal is needed.
The teaching plan is communicated with an acEvity that generally
uses acEve listening techniques to connect with the audience.A
summary of how the a\enEon of the audience was captured and
how the presentaEon was concluded is presented. The teaching
plan indicates that some nonverbal techniques were employed.
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some
inconsistency in organizaEon or in their relaEonships to each
other.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not
overly distracEng to the reader. Correct sentence structure and
audience-appropriate language are used.
Template is used, and formaang is correct, although some minor
errors may be present.
7
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style,
although some formaang errors may be present.
8
Good (92.00%)
The teaching plan is based on an approved topic. The
epidemiological raEonal needs some detail for accuracy or clarity.
All assignment criteria are adequately completed. Some raEonal is
needed for support or clarity. Overall, the teaching plan is
effecEve.
The teaching plan is communicated with an acEvity that uses
acEve listening techniques to connect with the audience. How the
a\enEon of the audience was captured and how the presentaEon
was concluded is presented. The teaching plan indicates that the
use of nonverbal techniques was employed.
A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent.
Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be
present. A variety of sentence structures and effecEve figures of
speech are used.
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formaang
style.
9
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style,
and format is mostly correct.
10
Excellent (100.00%) Comments
The teaching plan is based on an approved topic. The
epidemiological raEonal is well-supported and relevance to the
topic is demonstrated.
All assignment criteria are thoroughly completed. RaEonal and
detail is provided throughout.
The teaching plan is communicated with an acEvity that uses
clear acEve listening techniques to connect with the audience.A
clear descripEon of how the a\enEon of the audience was
captured and how the presentaEon was concluded is presented.
The teaching plan thoroughly describes nonverbal techniques
that were employed, such as eye contact, appropriate dress for
Proposal is well-organized and logical.Ideas progress and relate
to each other.Paragraph and transiEon construcEon guide the
reader.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, wri\en, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
11
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate
to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
12
Points Earned
13
14

Paper Assignments
Calculate your paper price
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -

Why Work with Us

Top Quality and Well-Researched Papers

We always make sure that writers follow all your instructions precisely. You can choose your academic level: high school, college/university or professional, and we will assign a writer who has a respective degree.

Professional and Experienced Academic Writers

We have a team of professional writers with experience in academic and business writing. Many are native speakers and able to perform any task for which you need help.

Free Unlimited Revisions

If you think we missed something, send your order for a free revision. You have 10 days to submit the order for review after you have received the final document. You can do this yourself after logging into your personal account or by contacting our support.

Prompt Delivery and 100% Money-Back-Guarantee

All papers are always delivered on time. In case we need more time to master your paper, we may contact you regarding the deadline extension. In case you cannot provide us with more time, a 100% refund is guaranteed.

Original & Confidential

We use several writing tools checks to ensure that all documents you receive are free from plagiarism. Our editors carefully review all quotations in the text. We also promise maximum confidentiality in all of our services.

24/7 Customer Support

Our support agents are available 24 hours a day 7 days a week and committed to providing you with the best customer experience. Get in touch whenever you need any assistance.

Try it now!

Calculate the price of your order

Total price:
$0.00

How it works?

Follow these simple steps to get your paper done

Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Our Services

No need to work on your paper at night. Sleep tight, we will cover your back. We offer all kinds of writing services.

Essays

Essay Writing Service

No matter what kind of academic paper you need and how urgent you need it, you are welcome to choose your academic level and the type of your paper at an affordable price. We take care of all your paper needs and give a 24/7 customer care support system.

Admissions

Admission Essays & Business Writing Help

An admission essay is an essay or other written statement by a candidate, often a potential student enrolling in a college, university, or graduate school. You can be rest assurred that through our service we will write the best admission essay for you.

Reviews

Editing Support

Our academic writers and editors make the necessary changes to your paper so that it is polished. We also format your document by correctly quoting the sources and creating reference lists in the formats APA, Harvard, MLA, Chicago / Turabian.

Reviews

Revision Support

If you think your paper could be improved, you can request a review. In this case, your paper will be checked by the writer or assigned to an editor. You can use this option as many times as you see fit. This is free because we want you to be completely satisfied with the service offered.